by Eric Meier

The issue and ethics surrounding the utilization of trees for lumber is oftentimes both expansive and ambiguous. Not only are there questions of sustainability (i.e., given the current rate of harvesting, can a particular species continue to reproduce at a sustainable rate so that demand will not outstrip supply?), but there’s also the matter of habitat destruction (i.e., even if a tree species can be sustainably harvested from the wild, would doing so destroy or endanger other species in the same habitat?).

Further mixed into this murky cocktail is the fact that for some countries—especially poorer third-world countries—lumber is big business, and placing a restriction on such a lucrative sector of their commerce would be seen as counter-productive, and consequently actual or potential levels of exploitation may not be easily or readily discovered.

However, despite the complexity of the issue, and the incomplete or even possibly faulty data, some information is better than no information. With these shortcomings in mind, there are two international entities that will be used and cited on this website, CITES and the IUCN.

CITES

An international agreement between governments was formed in 1973, called the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species, or CITES for short. CITES has three different levels of protection for species, known as Appendices.

Appendix I – This appendix represents species that are in the most danger and are considered to be threatened with extinction, and are consequently the most restricted in international trade.

Appendix II – This appendix contains species that are at risk in the wild, but not necessarily threatened with extinction. Species in this appendix are closely regulated, but are typically not as restricted as Appendix I.

Appendix III – This appendix contains species that a certain country (called a “party” within CITES), has voluntarily requested to be regulated in order to help preserve the species in question. Appendix III species regulation is only applicable for the specific party that has requested its inclusion, and is therefore much less restrictive than Appendix I or II.

Although there are literally thousands of plant species protected under CITES, only a portion of these species are trees, and of the included tree species, only a relatively small portion of them are actually used as lumber. Thus, the list below is a condensed and simplified version of the CITES Appendices, including only the species of trees that are typically used or harvested for lumber.

Jan 2, 2017 update: Coming up at the beginning of 2017, there are a few big changes set to go into effect on the CITES appendices. Most notably, the entire Dalbergia genus (all true rosewoods) will be on Appendix II. Also, Bubinga will be listed under Appendix II, and appears that this will also include finished products made from the wood as well.

CITES Listed Species

Common Name

Scientific Name

CITES Status

Listing Date

mm/dd/yyyy

AfrormosiaPericopsis elataAppendix II6/11/1992
AjoCaryocar costaricenseAppendix II (including finished wood products)7/1/1975
AlmendroDipteryx panamensisAppendix III (including finished wood products; wood from Costa Rica, and Nicaragua only)2/13/2003
Ash, Tamo Fraxinus mandshurica Appendix III (wood from Russia only) 6/24/2014
Bois de RoseDalbergia louveliiAppendix III (wood from Madagascar only)9/28/2011
BrazilwoodCaesalpinia echinataAppendix II9/13/2007
Cedar, SpanishCedrela odorataAppendix III (wood from Brazil, Bolivia, Columbia, Guatemala, and Peru only)6/12/2001
CocoboloDalbergia retusaAppendix II6/12/2013
Ebony, MadagascarDiospyros spp.Appendix II (wood from Madagascar only)9/28/2011
Lignum VitaeGuaiacum spp.Appendix II (including finished wood products)2/13/2003
Mahogany, CubanSwietenia mahagoniAppendix II6/11/1992
Mahogany, HonduranSwietenia macrophyllaAppendix II (wood from Neotropics only)11/16/1995
Mahogany, MexicanSwietenia humilisAppendix II (including finished wood products)7/1/1975
Monkey PuzzleAraucaria araucanaAppendix I (including finished wood products)7/1/1975
Oak, JapaneseQuercus mongolicaAppendix III (wood from Russia only)6/24/2014
Podocarp, Black PinePodocarpus neriifoliusAppendix III (including finished wood products, wood from Nepal only)11/16/1975
RaminGonystylus spp.Appendix II (including finished wood products)8/6/2001
Rosewood, BrazilianDalbergia nigraAppendix I (including finished wood products)6/11/1992
Rosewood, HonduranDalbergia stevensoniiAppendix II2/12/2008
Rosewood, MadagascarDalbergia madagascariensisAppendix III (wood from Madagascar only)9/28/2011
Rosewood, YucatanDalbergia tucurensisAppendix III (wood from Nicaragua only)6/24/2014
Rosewood, SiameseDalbergia cochinchinensisAppendix II3/13/2013
Stinkwood, RedPrunus africanaAppendix II (including finished wood products)2/16/1995
Argentine Lignum VitaeBulnesia sarmientoiAppendix II6/23/2010
ZitanPterocarpus santalinus Appendix II2/16/1995 

 

Note that a listing generally means that trade of the raw wood, either in log, board, or veneer form, is restricted. On some species, the restriction is even greater, and includes even finished products made of or including a protected wood: one of the most common instances of this is with guitars made of Brazilian Rosewood. In these instances, it is illegal to take such items across international borders without a proper export permit.

If you believe that the wood or finished wood product was harvested/made before the date of the CITES listing, you still cannot legally travel with or export the wood unless you have written proof or other evidence that it was obtained before the listing date. If you have the required evidence, and are willing to pay a processing fee and wait 2-3 months for processing, then you may be eligible for a Pre-Convention Certificate.

In most cases, importing/exporting raw wood listed on CITES Appendices I or II can be complicated and costly, and in most cases, is neither legal nor encouraged. Some wood is further restricted to include even finished wood products, and in all but the most exceptional cases, is not recommended.

If ever in doubt on such complicated issues, be sure to consult proper authorities to get a matter clarified.

 

IUCN

Founded in 1948, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (or IUCN for short) is both the oldest and largest network dealing with global environmental issues. Perhaps most notably for woodworkers, the IUCN publishes what is known as The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™.

Species included on the Red List fall into one of three categories:

Critically Endangered: Reportedly facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild in the immediate future.

Endangered: Not critically endangered, but reportedly still facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future.

Vulnerable: Not endangered, but reportedly still facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future.

It should be noted that “the immediate future” here is relative: the IUCN uses the gauge of three generations to determine a species’ rate of depletion. With mammals and other shorter-lived organisms, this tri-generational window may only be a few years or decades. However, since trees can be extremely long-lived, (several decades or even centuries for a single generation), the overall timeline for endangered trees is generally more drawn-out than other endangered species.

In addition to the three listed categories above, there are also a few other assessments that the IUCN makes on species:

Near Threatened: Technically doesn’t meet the Red List criteria of a vulnerable or endangered species, but is close to qualifying and/or may qualify in the near future.

Conservation Dependent: Currently the focus of a species or habitat-specific conservation program. Cessation of such conservation programs would shortly result in the species being listed on the Red List.

Data Deficient: Either not enough data to make an accurate assessment, or a species’ listing has been disputed or challenged.

Least Concern: Species that aren’t near threatened, and are not dependent on conservation efforts.

It should also be noted that one unintentional shortcoming of the Red List is that it only considers the risk of extinction; broader issues dealing with habitat destruction or deforestation are not considered. Also, it doesn’t necessarily take into account the maturity of the trees (i.e., centuries-old trees are cut down, and subsequently replanted with saplings).

Red List Species

Common Name

Scientific Name

IUCN Red List Status

AburaMitragyna spp.Vulnerable
AfrormosiaPericopsis elataEndangered
AfzeliaAfzelia spp.Vulnerable/Endangered
BalauShorea spp.Critically Endangered
Bois de RoseDalbergia maritimaEndangered
BosseGuarea cedrataVulnerable
BrazilwoodCaesalpinia echinataEndangered
BrownheartVouacapoua americanaCritically Endangered
Cedar of LebanonCedrus libaniVulnerable
Cedar, Port OrfordChamaecyparis lawsonianaVulnerable
Cedar, SpanishCedrela odorataVulnerable
CocoboloDalbergia retusaVulnerable
Ebony, BrownCaesalpinia paraguariensisVulnerable
Ebony, GaboonDiospyros crassifloraEndangered
Ebony, MacassarDiospyros celebicaVulnerable
Ebony, MunDiospyros munCritically Endangered
EtimoeCopaifera salikoundaVulnerable
IdigboTerminalia ivorensisVulnerable
ImbuiaOcotea porosaVulnerable
IrokoMilicia spp.Vulnerable
KeruingDipterocarpus spp.Critically Endangered
KotoPterygota macrocarpaVulnerable
Lignum VitaeGuaiacum spp.Endangered
Mahogany, AfricanKhaya spp.Vulnerable
Mahogany, CubanSwietenia mahoganiEndangered
Mahogany, HonduranSwietenia macrophyllaVulnerable
MakoreTieghemella heckeliiEndangered
MerantiShorea spp.Critically Endangered
MerbauIntsia spp.Vulnerable
MoabiBaillonella toxispermaVulnerable
Monkey PuzzleAraucaria araucanaEndangered
NarraPterocarpus indicusVulnerable
NyatohPalaquiuim spp.Vulnerable
OkoumeAucoumea klaineanaVulnerable
Peroba RosaAspidosperma polyneuronEndangered
Pine, LongleafPinus palustrisVulnerable
Pine, Norfolk IslandAraucaria heterophyllaVulnerable
Pine, ParanaAraucaria angustifoliaCritically Endangered
Pine, SumatranPinus merkusiiVulnerable
RaminGonystylus spp.Vulnerable
RedwoodSequoia sempervirensVulnerable
Rosewood, BrazilianDalbergia nigraVulnerable
Rosewood, BurmeseDalbergia oliveriEndangered
Rosewood, East IndianDalbergia latifoliaVulnerable
Rosewood, MadagascarDalbergia baroniiVulnerable
Rosewood, SiameseDalbergia cochinchinensisVulnerable
SapeleEntandrophragma cylindricumVulnerable
Satinwood, CeylonChloroxylon swieteniaVulnerable
Satinwood, West IndianZanthoxylum flavumVulnerable
UtileEntandrophragma utileVulnerable
Walnut, AfricanLovoa trichilioidesVulnerable
Walnut, ClaroJuglans californicaVulnerable
Walnut, PeruvianJuglans spp.Endangered
WengeMillettia laurentiiEndangered
ZebrawoodMicroberlinia brazzavillensisVulnerable

 

Borderline IUCN Species

Common Name

Scientific Name

IUCN Status

AmendoimPterogyne nitensNear Threatened
AndirobaCarapa spp.Endangered (single species)
AnigrePouteria spp.Conservation Dependent
AraracangaAspidosperma megalocarponNear Threatened
Blackwood, AfricanDalbergia melanoxylonNear Threatened
Blackwood, BurmeseDalbergia cultrataNear Threatened
CamphorCinnamomum spp.Endangered/Vulnerable (three species)
EbiaraBerlinia spp.Endangered/Vulnerable (three species)
Ebony, CeylonDiospyros ebenumData Deficient
GreenheartChlorocardium rodieiData Deficient
Juniper, AfricanJuniperus proceraNear Threatened
KempasKoompassia malaccensisConservation Dependent
MacacaubaPlatymiscium spp.Endangered (single species)
MangoMangifera indicaData Deficient
Mesquite, BlackProsopis nigraData Deficient
MuningaPterocarpus angolensisNear Threatened
Padauk, AndamanPterocarpus dalbergioidesData Deficient
Pau FerroMachaerium spp.Vulnerable (single species)
PaulowniaPaulownia spp.Critically Endangered (single species)
Pine, HuonLagarostrobos frankliniiConservation Dependent
Pine, RadiataPinus radiataConservation Dependent
Pine, SandPinus clausaNear Threatened
PistachioPistacia veraNear Threatened
QuebrachoSchinopsis spp.Vulnerable (single species)
RengasGluta spp.Vulnerable (single species)
SugiCryptomeria japonicaNear Threatened
Teak, RhodesianBaikiaea plurijugaNear Threatened
VerawoodBulnesia sarmientoiConservation Dependent
Walnut, EnglishJuglans regiaNear Threatened
Yew, PacificTaxus brevifoliaNear Threatened

 

IUCN 2014. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. <http://www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 21 April 2014.

  • barry biesanz

    Aji is a Peruvian chili sauce, Ajo is the endangered tree species.

    Gets huge, never been able to find seeds. Not a great cabinet wood.

    CR

  • eaglegreen

    What is “Birch Cedar” –you listed it as an abundant wood to use, but I couldn’t find it in your CITES list, which you said I could use to look up wood. . . . ?? Help. . ..

    • ejmeier

      Huh? I don’t know of any wood on this website that would be described as “Birch Cedar.”

      But if a wood is abundant to use, it more than likely would not be listed on the CITES appendices; this list only includes species that are considered threatened or endangered.

      • eaglegreen

        In the original article I read, there were a couple of lists toward the beginning part of the article which were in bold print–I think they were abundant woods to use–and that is where I saw “Birch Cedar”. . . .I wondered if it was a ‘new’ wood I wasn’t familiar with, or if it was meant to have a comma between, or, perhaps be individual entries, one after the other. . . ..

    • Patrick Clark

      I know it’s a song, just add spruce to the end and voila, it’s a song.

  • zylstra

    IUCN is not “the largest network dealing with global environmental issues” by either revenue or assets.

    • wolf

      Which one is the biggest by revenue or assets?

  • Job applicant

    I can get all of the gaboon Ebony you can pay for at $145 per board foot.

  • Job applicant

    I can also get Lignum Vitae if you got the bucks

  • IrisWall

    African Blackwood Conservation Project – very important – http://www.blackwoodconservation.org/

  • IrisWall

    Pernambucco Wood for Violin Bows – Brazil – preservation project: http://www.arcosbrasil.com/site/?p=pernambuco

  • Rowland Heights ChessKraft

    I was just told that Indian Rosewood and Sheesham are now restricted by the Indian Government.

  • ATUL GUPTA

    is Indian mahogany wood restricted ?

    • ejmeier

      I assume you are referring to the species Toona ciliata. To my knowledge, it is not restricted in an international sense (i.e., not CITES listed), though there may be restrictions in place on harvesting the wood on a national level.

      • Atul Gupta

        Thanks for throwing some light on it.
        yes its Toona. Would you call that an open grain wood or closed. I am trying to figure if we can use that for making kitchen cutting board.

  • Dylan Alexander

    I tried to find out what type of wood my floor is, it was made in the 50’s and all I know now is that it is endangered.

  • ROAMARS TM

    @ejmeier:disqus This might be abit off topic. So am doing this project, and I need to use pine wood. I could either buy it from a local store for $7 or use pine that’s already at home. I would go for the pine at home, but do you reckon there would be a compromise in the quality of the wood? i.e. in terms of strength – since the testing stage of the project deals with alot of impact being inflicted on the pine wood.

  • ejmeier

    I don’t know of any current restriction on chestnut. There may be local or regional restrictions in place, but nothing international that I am aware of.

    • Dane Chandler

      There exists no none American chestnut trees. They are extinct.